Web application security
Authentication, sessions, access control, input handling, sensitive workflows and security misconfiguration.
Practical web application and API security assessments for SaaS teams. Understand the risks that matter, validate what is real, and give engineers a clear path to remediation.
Independent practice · Shaswat Raj · India
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW — NOT LIVE SCAN DATA
Application-focused reviews for the systems your customers and team rely on.
Authentication, sessions, access control, input handling, sensitive workflows and security misconfiguration.
Authorization boundaries, object-level access, authentication, rate-limit behavior and input validation.
Tenant separation, role permissions and attempts to reach resources outside an account's approved access.
A focused look at key security controls, configuration choices and engineering practices.
Understand the issue, why it matters, how to reproduce it safely and what your team can change.
Verify agreed remediation changes and document what has been resolved or remains open.
The goal is not a long list of scanner output. It is a reliable assessment that helps your team make better security decisions.
Confirm ownership, approved domains, test accounts, environments, exclusions, timing and stop conditions.
Map approved routes, APIs, roles, data flows and important business workflows.
Use appropriate techniques, then manually review evidence and confirm reproducibility and impact.
Deliver prioritized findings, walk through the results and verify agreed fixes in a follow-up window.
Clear enough for leadership. Detailed enough for the people fixing the issue.
Scope, key observations, risk themes and prioritized next steps.
Evidence-backed details to help engineers reproduce and address issues.
A focused handover session to discuss important issues and implementation questions.
A follow-up record of the agreed fixes that were checked.
Illustrative starting ranges in INR. Final quotations depend on application size, roles, API surface, depth and agreed test conditions.
For a focused first look at a small product or release.
For one small staging application with defined workflows.
For broader application and API workflows with more roles.
Indicative independent-practice starting ranges, not a promise of a full penetration test at every price. A written scope and quote define exactly what is included.
Share a little about your product, environment and timeline. I'll establish a safe, realistic scope before proposing any testing.
Staging is preferred. Production testing is considered only when explicitly authorized, risk-assessed and covered by written rules of engagement.
For authenticated testing, client-provided test accounts with agreed roles are usually needed. Real customer credentials should not be shared.
No. An application security assessment is not a certification or guarantee of SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS or any other compliance status.
Potential issues are reviewed for reproducibility, scope and impact before being described as validated findings. Limitations are documented.
Referral or subcontracting arrangements can be discussed. The client, authorization, responsibilities and reporting path must be clear.
We agree target assets, authorization, scope, exclusions, schedule, emergency contact, data handling and stop conditions in writing.